Overall, the term « ad hominem argument » is used in everyday language primarily to refer to a deceptive attack that, for some reason, is flawed, for example. B because it is not relevant to the discussion, but ad hominem arguments may also be reasonable and logically sound. The more you read about examples of ad-hominem arguments, the more you can recognize them and, if necessary, defend yourself against such claims. Simply calling the scientist a « greedy liar » is an abusive attack on ad-hominem and does not contribute to the discussion, which is why it should be avoided. This use is usually found only in the philosophical field or in use before the twentieth century. [25] This type of argument is also called ex concessis argument (latin for « of what has already been admitted »). [26] However, a similar ad-hominem argument, better formulated, might be reasonable in similar circumstances. For example, look at the following discussion: A simple conversation can suddenly take a left turn in the ad hominem territory. Something very innocent can accidentally become a personal attack on someone else. Let`s take a look at a few other examples so you can keep your Ad Hominem detective skills to the point. In everyday language, the term « ad hominem argument » is used primarily to refer to a misleading personal attack on the source of an argument that, logically, is not solid. This is not necessarily a case of ad hominem – credibility is whether we should believe whether a person is telling the truth or not, whether the arguments they are making are reasonable or not. .

. .